10 UVM Verification Interview Questions and Answers
Prepare for your next interview with our comprehensive guide on UVM Verification, featuring expert insights and practical questions.
Prepare for your next interview with our comprehensive guide on UVM Verification, featuring expert insights and practical questions.
UVM (Universal Verification Methodology) is a standardized methodology for verifying integrated circuit designs. It provides a framework for creating modular, reusable, and scalable testbenches, making it a critical skill for professionals in the semiconductor industry. UVM’s structured approach helps in managing the complexity of modern chip designs, ensuring thorough verification and reducing time-to-market.
This article offers a curated selection of UVM Verification interview questions designed to test your understanding and application of the methodology. By working through these questions, you will gain deeper insights into UVM principles and be better prepared to demonstrate your expertise in verification environments.
The Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) is a standardized approach for verifying integrated circuit designs, built on SystemVerilog. It provides a framework for creating modular, reusable, and scalable testbenches, promoting reusability and standardization. UVM supports the creation of testbenches that can be reused across projects, reducing development time and effort. Key benefits include reusability, scalability, standardization, debugging and reporting features, and automation of verification tasks.
The factory pattern in UVM allows for flexible and scalable creation of components without specifying the exact class. Implemented using the uvm_factory
class, it enables dynamic component creation based on testbench requirements.
Example:
class my_env extends uvm_env; `uvm_component_utils(my_env) my_agent agent; function new(string name, uvm_component parent); super.new(name, parent); endfunction function void build_phase(uvm_phase phase); super.build_phase(phase); agent = my_agent::type_id::create("agent", this); endfunction endclass class my_agent extends uvm_agent; `uvm_component_utils(my_agent) function new(string name, uvm_component parent); super.new(name, parent); endfunction endclass initial begin uvm_config_db#(uvm_object_wrapper)::set(null, "uvm_test_top.env.agent", "type_name", my_agent::get_type()); run_test(); end
In this example, my_env
contains an instance of my_agent
, created using the factory pattern. The uvm_config_db
sets the agent type dynamically.
The UVM configuration database stores and retrieves configuration settings, promoting modularity and reusability. It uses a key-value pair system for parameters like timeouts and addresses.
Example:
// Setting a configuration value uvm_config_db#(int)::set(null, "env.agent1.*", "timeout", 100); // Getting a configuration value int timeout; if (!uvm_config_db#(int)::get(null, "env.agent1.*", "timeout", timeout)) begin `uvm_error("CONFIG", "Timeout configuration not found") end
Here, a timeout value is stored and retrieved using the configuration database.
The UVM register layer models and accesses registers and memories, standardizing register access methods and enabling automated generation of register models. It facilitates self-checking testbenches and improves coverage collection.
Example:
class my_reg_model extends uvm_reg_block; uvm_reg my_reg; function new(string name = "my_reg_model"); super.new(name, UVM_NO_COVERAGE); endfunction virtual function void build(); my_reg = uvm_reg::type_id::create("my_reg"); my_reg.configure(this, null, "RW", 32, 0, 0); my_reg.add_hdl_path_slice("my_reg", 0, 32); endfunction endclass // Usage in a testbench my_reg_model reg_model; initial begin reg_model = my_reg_model::type_id::create("reg_model"); reg_model.build(); reg_model.my_reg.write(status, 32'hDEADBEEF); end
Functional coverage in UVM measures how much of the design’s functionality has been exercised. It is implemented using covergroups, which define coverage points and bins.
Example:
class my_coverage extends uvm_subscriber #(my_transaction); covergroup cg; coverpoint trans.addr { bins addr_bins[] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}; } coverpoint trans.data { bins data_bins[] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}; } endgroup function new(string name = "my_coverage", uvm_component parent); super.new(name, parent); cg = new(); endfunction virtual function void write(my_transaction trans); cg.sample(); endfunction endclass class my_env extends uvm_env; my_coverage cov; function new(string name, uvm_component parent); super.new(name, parent); endfunction function void build_phase(uvm_phase phase); super.build_phase(phase); cov = my_coverage::type_id::create("cov", this); endfunction endclass
Common debugging techniques in UVM include:
The UVM reporting mechanism uses uvm_report_*
methods to categorize and prioritize messages, supporting verbosity levels for message filtering. It aids debugging by providing a structured way to log messages, allowing users to filter, track, and customize reports, and centralizing logging.
UVM callbacks insert custom behavior into pre-defined points in a component’s execution flow, allowing behavior modification without altering original implementation.
Example Scenario:
For a UVM driver sending transactions to a DUT, use callbacks for custom logging or error checking before and after each transaction.
class my_driver extends uvm_driver #(my_transaction); `uvm_component_utils(my_driver) typedef class my_driver_callback; my_driver_callback cb; function new(string name, uvm_component parent); super.new(name, parent); endfunction virtual task run_phase(uvm_phase phase); my_transaction tr; forever begin seq_item_port.get_next_item(tr); if (cb != null) cb.pre_send(tr); // Send the transaction to the DUT if (cb != null) cb.post_send(tr); seq_item_port.item_done(); end endtask endclass class my_driver_callback extends uvm_callback; virtual function void pre_send(my_transaction tr); // Custom behavior before sending the transaction endfunction virtual function void post_send(my_transaction tr); // Custom behavior after sending the transaction endfunction endclass // Register the callback my_driver driver = my_driver::type_id::create("driver", this); my_driver_callback cb = my_driver_callback::type_id::create("cb"); driver.cb = cb;
In this example, my_driver
includes a callback object for custom behavior before and after sending transactions.
In UVM, sequences generate stimulus for the DUT, and sequence libraries organize these sequences for efficient reuse and management.
Example:
class my_sequence extends uvm_sequence #(my_transaction); `uvm_object_utils(my_sequence) function new(string name = "my_sequence"); super.new(name); endfunction virtual task body(); my_transaction tx; tx = my_transaction::type_id::create("tx"); start_item(tx); tx.randomize(); finish_item(tx); endtask endclass class my_sequence_library extends uvm_sequence_library #(my_transaction); `uvm_object_utils(my_sequence_library) function new(string name = "my_sequence_library"); super.new(name); endfunction function void add_sequences(); this.add_sequence(my_sequence::type_id::get()); endfunction endclass
Here, my_sequence
generates a transaction, and my_sequence_library
organizes sequences for reuse.
Scoreboarding in UVM verifies DUT outputs by comparing them against expected values. A scoreboard class receives transactions from the DUT and a reference model, comparing them for matches.
Example:
class my_scoreboard extends uvm_scoreboard; `uvm_component_utils(my_scoreboard) // Expected and actual data queues uvm_tlm_analysis_fifo #(transaction) expected_fifo; uvm_tlm_analysis_fifo #(transaction) actual_fifo; function new(string name, uvm_component parent); super.new(name, parent); expected_fifo = new("expected_fifo", this); actual_fifo = new("actual_fifo", this); endfunction // Method to compare expected and actual transactions task run_phase(uvm_phase phase); transaction expected, actual; forever begin expected_fifo.get(expected); actual_fifo.get(actual); if (expected != actual) begin `uvm_error("SCOREBOARD", $sformatf("Mismatch: expected %0s, got %0s", expected.convert2string(), actual.convert2string())) end end endtask endclass
In this example, the scoreboard compares transactions from expected and actual FIFOs, reporting mismatches.